I’d been thinking about this for awhile, but conversations with Rob Lee and then a presentation with him really helped me clarify my thinking on this issue. Here goes:
If you are doing incident response, you are psychologically, if not operationally, in a reactive rather than proactive mode. To do it right, incident response needs to be part of your ongoing daily business process. True incident response only occurs during major breaches. As part of your incident management, you proactively – days, months, even years in advance – address the issues that might create a need to respond to an incident.
By managing incidents rather than responding to them, you:
- Reduce the severity of the incidents that do occur.
- Reduce the number of incidents that do occur.
- Shift from responding to incidents to managing incidents as part of your normal operations
- Reduce unforeseen expenses related to incident investigations
- Increase your visibility within the business, and thus the support for your organization
- Strengthen security posture (Thank you to Corey)
- Reduce stress on your staff and increase their job satisfaction (unless they are adrenalin junkies)
An incident management mindset depends on accepting a truism:
Compromise Is Inevitable – Something truly malicious has been in, is in, and will be in your environment.
If you accept that compromise is inevitable, why wait for it to happen? Why not get ahead of it, reduce its impact, and increase your resilience?
Which leads me to my second point – traditional emergency management has been doing this for decades. If you do a search for “Emergency management cycle”, you will find many images similar to the following:
Tornados, earthquakes, fires, automobile accidents, heart attacks, and many more emergencies happen daily. Rather than treating these as one off incidents that require all hands on deck, emergency services plan, recruit, train, and respond in a very calm, business like manner because it is their normal business. (I speak from 15 years of emergency management experience. Find a fire fighter in your organization and run this past them.) When a fire engine rolls up to a fire, does everyone jump out, run around, and add to the chaos? No, they respond in a very consistent, calm, and methodical manner.
Take a hard look at ICS – Incident Command System. FEMA has several short, online courses to familiarize you with it. Step back and think about how it might apply to your organization. The modular, scalable nature of ICS enables effective response to incidents by multiple agencies. Sounds like something that might apply to a breach investigation? (You don’t need to buy into all the labels. Just think about the core concepts.)
In closing, let me ask you to think on two points:
- Manage incidents, and the entire lifecycle, in a way that enables you to treat incidents as part of your normal operational tempo.
- Pay attention to how traditional emergency management works and learn from them. An enormous amount of thought and effort has been invested in emergency management already. Build on that rather than try to recreate everything.
I gave a presentation at SANS DFIR Summit in Prague this morning. My presentation was designed to introduce DFIR practitioners to the larger business context that they might be working within. This could help with career progression, avoiding frustration in the workplace, or developing your reputation within your firm to name just a few possibilities.
Any and all feedback on the presentation is welcome.
David Cowen announced that he has submitted a patent application for NTFS TriForce. Let me start off by stating that I admire David quite a bit, I think TriForce is very useful and pushes into new territory, and that I am not angry at anyone, least of all David.
That said, I’m very concerned. The discussion is going on over in G+. Here is my very off the top of my head contribution to what may be a very interesting discussion. I hope others chime in.
From the G+ post:
I think my response may have been phrased in overly strong language. I’ve given some thought to why – why I am concerned and why my response was more emotional than the situation warranted.
My perception was that your tool was well supported by the community, and that through your beta program, presentations, and blog posts you were engaging with the community to help develop it. I, rightly or wrongly, mentally lumped it in with other reasonably priced tools that were closely tied to the DFIR community. So when I saw your patent post my immediate thought was “There’s another tool that I’m not going to want to support any more.”
Your post set off warning bells in my hindbrain. My experience with patents has almost always been negative, and in some very personal ways at times. I’ve had colleagues say “I’m doing this for all of us” on more than one occasion. Even when they were being honest, there were negative repercussions.
I think you’re going to run into prior art issues, and quite a few of them. I think that this may be part of my emotional reaction. My perception is that the prior art may be the DFIR community’s work and I’m reacting to the perception that you may be trying, directly or indirectly, to patent the work of many other people.
I fear that you may set off an arms race in the DFIR community. Maybe it is going to happen anyhow and you’re just getting there first. I don’t really want to be a part of that, and I’m not going to be thrilled about watching it happen if it does occur.
Guidance is a very poor example to cite of good behavior with respect to public relations, community engagement, and good business decisions. If they are your model for pretty much anything, you’re elevating my level of concern.
There are other ways to protect and control your intellectual property without patents. Sharing your thoughts on why you’re going with patents rather than licensing would be helpful.
Someone asked me if I am angry. I’m not. I am quite concerned though and I look forward to seeing how this plays out.
ircollect is a Python tool designed to collect files of interest in an incident response investigation or triage effort. This is very beta code. I’m hacking on it regularly, using it to learn about internal structures, finding minor and major issues, …. Use it at your own risk! If you have advice on how to address issues I’ve encountered, please share ….
In the process of writing this, I added data run parsing and ADS detection to analyzeMFT so those are now available.
The github site has more details and will be updated much more regularly than this blog.
Running as local admin, it:
- Opens the raw disk
- Reads the master boot record, collects a copy of it, and uses the MBR to find partition and disk information
- Using the MBR information, it finds the NTFS partitions.
- Working from the start of the NTFS partition, it finds the $MFT
- It collects a copy of the $MFT and then builds a list of all the files on the system and their data runs
- Using the file list and data runs, it collects interesting files through direct reads from the disk, bypassing access controls.
All collected files are stored in a directory specified with the -d option. They are further organized by hostname and the date-time the script was run.
pip install analyzemft
VERY beta. Active development daily, often hourly.
Currently collects master boot record, $MFT, and live (corrupted) registry hives. User can modify table in ircollect.py to specify any files they desire.
Thank you to:
- Jamie Levy for mbr_parser
- Willi Ballenthin – bit manipulation code, lots of useful tips for analyzeMFT
So, I wanted to access locked registry hives. Simple enough using F-Response, but it devolves into various solutions that are not well supported after that. I came across one solution that was of particular interest from a response side but also from an attack side:
In short, it opens a read handle to the C volume, parses the NTFS structures, and reads the files directly thus bypassing all access controls and locks. You do need to be local admin to run it.
This is great for getting locked registry hives, or for remotely copying NTDS.dit without deploying hacker tools on the remote system. Bear in mind that the remote system needs to be running the WS-Management service. This is not running by default on our Windows 7 desktops, but the author mentioned that it is running by default on Windows Server 2012.
There are a number of niggling issues with getting PowerShell scripts to run. This article covers almost all of them nicely: Execution Policy
However, it didn’t cover one issue – what happens when you try to do:
and get a registry access error?
This post explains how to edit the registry directly.
Once you’ve worked your way through those issues, you can grab local and remote files to your heart’s content.
The Digital Forensics and Incident Response fiction reading list, in no particular order:
- Ender’s Game – Orson Scott Card
- Jumper and Reflex – Steven Gould
- Most anything by John Grisham
- Daemon – Daniel Suarez
- Zero Day and Trojan Horse – Mark Russinovich (yes, that Mark)
- Pretty much anything on the Access Data or Guidance Software support web sites
- Blue Nowhere – Jeffrey Deaver
- Halting State and Rule 34 – Charles Stross
- Zero History – William Gibson
- American Gods – Neil Gaiman
- The Magicians – Lev Grossman
- The Night Watch Trilogy – Sergei Lukyanenko
I’m fairly new to malware analysis having spent most of the last ten years doing IT consulting, computer forensics, ediscovery, and some related work. I’m now doing a lot of incident response and am taking on some malware analysis responsibilities, at least on a triage and management level.
We got phished the other day, and a rather nice phish it was. Kudos to the mail team for shutting it down quickly and to an alert user who escalated it as well. Some quick dynamic analysis led to a PDF, and there our story starts.
If you open the PDF up you’ll get a rectangle and possibly an error message.
So what do we as analysts do with this? There are a lot of analysis tools out there and I worked my way through quite a few of them, partly just to see what worked, and how they worked. The one I ended up using was peepdf. I barely scratched the surface of its capabilities, but the following features sold me on it for this project:
- It handled the malformed references that many other PDF analysis tools failed to handle.
- It is command line based and scriptable. If you develop a peepdf workflow, put that into a file and execute it each time
- Search raw and decoded objects
- Spidermonkey built in
So, I loaded my malicious PDF into peepdf and got the following output:
s = s + char(str(int(concat(b1, b2), 0x1a)))
It is building a string up by concatenating pairs of bytes, converting that to an integer with radix 0x1a, and converting that to a string and then into a character.
So that is the second part, a decryption routine, but it needs something to decrypt. I guessed that the first part located the stuff to decrypt and that it found it using the keyword “creation date”. So, how to find that stuff? Back to peepdf:
The search for “creation date” didn’t turn up anything, but searching for “creation” produced hits in object 3 and object 43. We’re already looking at object 43 so let us see what is in object 3. Lo and behold, there is CreationDate and a lot of … stuff. Working on the assumption that the code in object 43 will decode the stuff in object 3, I proceeded as follows. (Yes, there is probably a way to do this all within peepdf, but I’m still learning how to use spidermonkey properly so I took this route.)
First, dump object 3 out.
PPDF> object 3 > object3.txt
Write a Python version of the code in object 43:
Strip the noise off the front of object3.txt (“<< /Title asdasdsad/CreationDate %#^&*%^#@&%#@3”) and then run the Python code against the object 3 stuff we saved earlier:
> jsparse.py -f object3.txt > object3.js
And then jump back into peepdf and clean up the newly created code:
PPDF> js_beautify file object3.txt > object3-clean.js
This illustrates one of the things that I love about peepdf – it includes a lot of very useful functionality in the application so you don’t need to jump in and out of the tool all the time. (My foray into Python is due to my own issues and not peepdf’s.)
object3-clean.js now contains the second stage of the malicious PDF.
This was a pretty high level run through of a relatively simple problem done by someone rather new to the subject, but hopefully it left you with the confidence to dive into this sort of thing yourself. There are a lot of good tools out there, lots of examples to work on, and many good people to help you out. (Tip of the hat to Willi and to the folks from rem-alumni.)